Chuck Norris on Obama’s Impotent Christmas Message

No offense, but I disagree with all of those.

But I am still entitled to my opinions, as so far, all you have done is attack my personal stances, insulting my opinions, and not proven anything.

Obama can go to church wherever he wants, or not at all. It is his right. I may not agree, but that is the whole point of America! We have freedom! This isn't Spain during the inquisition, or England during the early 1600's.

@ reformed.

Ahh the irony. First off, this is a blog, similar to a forum. Perfect grammar and spelling is not required. If it were, the "r" in "reformed" would be capitalized for one. Another thing. Bible is also capitalized. I will thank you to not flame me for any trivial grammatical mistakes I make, or have made. In fact, you have far more errors then I do.

Also, I don't know what Bible you read from, but my Bible says numerous things about honoring those who have the rule over us, and the like. Now, I don't agree with everything the government does, but it is still my duty to obey and honor those in authority. We can still oppose their agenda, but not by insulting the man. If we turn to name calling, insults, etc, we are practicing the same tactics Saul Alinski (sp) taught.

Maybe you read the Bible different. After all, if your name references reformed theology, then you can take (almost) everything the Bible says about Israel and apply it to the Church. Sorry, I don't take those liberties with God's Word.

Differences in interpretation and opinions exist. Everyone is entitled to them. Even Muslims, atheists, etc. Yes, I agree with much of what the Libertarians believe in. 80% of objectivism is sound, and even more would be if allowance would be made for God being one ultimate authority. I disagree with you, you disagree with me. But please, stop trolling my posts.

So much for that whole, "Well now that he is our president we'll pray for him," that came from conservatives, huh? It looks like when Obama shows his true colors, so do we.

The comments here are evidence enough of that.

Shameful.

Actually those conservatives were talking about imprecatory prayer, i.e., that God would remove him from office one way or another. The other type of prayer is reserved for those who could be and may be redeemable to the extent we are prompted to do so by the Holy Spirit. In Obama's case, the latter is very doubtful. It is more shameful that we don't pray more of that type of prayer and that more Christians be more outspoken to protect their God-given inheritance, freedoms and rights.

A few things:

1. I thought you might go to the imprecatory prayer. Unfortunately, the fact that you did indicates the extent to which you stand in stark contrast to Biblical witness. No doubt in the Old Testament some used imprecatory prayer (i.e. David as evidenced in the Psalms), but at what point did this become prescriptive for the people of God? Better yet, at what point did Jesus use imprecatory prayer or permit his disciples to do so? Did not Jesus forbid them in Luke 9:51-56? Do you not think that if Jesus had wanted Caesar out of office, he of all people could have made it happen? Wasn't it Jesus who told his disciple to love their enemies (Matt. 5:43-48) and to bless those who persecute?

And just so we're clear, imprecatory prayer is a prayer requesting harm. Not just that he would be removed from office, but that God would inflict harm upon he and his family. Surely you cannot take Psalm 109:8 without verse 9 as well.

2. Of course, it is not surprising that you would summon God to inflict harm upon someone since you have no problem declaring them beyond redemption. Way to be, man! Good to know that we have someone like yourself around to tell us who is and isn't "likely" to respond to the Holy Spirit's prompting so as not to waste our time. Out of curiosity, how do you go about making these sorts of decisions? Is it the Holy Spirit working in you or just plain old pharisaism?

3. What, pray tell, are the God-given inheritance, freedoms and rights that you speak of? The right to own guns? The right to free speech? The right to consumerist greed? The right to vote?

This has nothing to do with God. This has to do with the idol of America.

You do have the right to own a gun. You do also have the right to free speech and you do have the right to be greedy. Unless you're living in squalor, are opposed to defending your family, and against your right to speak on this blog, I suppose you feel the same way as well.

Ya. He's pretty much a two-faced, lying closet Muslim that wants to bring Statism into full swing here in Amerika. It's a crying shame that Americans were so quick to jump on the SLOWbama bandwagon JUST BECAUSE he was the "voice of change." Well America, embrace the change you voted in. If you ever wanted to know what it was like to live in Czarist Russia, stand by.

Ouch. No offense, but please, let us not beginning to follow the common liberal theme of insulting those whom we disagree with. I detest President Obama's policies, but believe that as president, he is still due some measure of respect. One must not make such statements without real proof, or one appears to be a fool. For it is true, is it not, that there are, sadly, many Christians who do not attend church.

As well, do you have any idea what life was like in Czarist Russia? If not, then why act as if you do? The government structure was intrinsically different, and thus the population was left without the rights we have.

However, I do agree with you on some points. For one, I wish the Democrats would give me back my tax dollars they intend to spend on the murder of the unborn, and on sub-par health care, and keep their change. It appears that since the left is lacking in sense (cents) they want even more change. Sorry for the pun.

Obama has shown America who he is and what he is about before the elections.